Above, Beyond, Yet Within: A Hidden Trinity of Everything

An Insight Into the Shape of Existence

---

Existence. Three syllables.

There are few things more taken for granted than existence.

It’s the water we swim in and the air we never see. It greets us in the mirror and whispers in the silence. And yet, for all our telescopes and theology, for all our data sets and dogmas, we still don’t quite know what it is. Not fully. Not really.

We know it moves. That it stretches and bends and sometimes breaks. We know that it comes in flavors: matter and mind, breath and brick, song and silence. We’ve tried to map it, through science, through scripture, through story. But always, somewhere near the edge, it slips from our grasp like a memory we were never meant to hold.

But what if we’re looking at it sideways?

What if the nature of existence isn’t best explained in a line or a list, but in a rhythm?
What if the universe, from quark to question, is built not from one thing, but from three?

---

The Bias of Being: Seeing Through a Keyhole

Every system we trust, physics, psychology, and even poetry, begins with what can be perceived.
But perception has bias. It’s grounded in our senses, which are grounded in this dimension, which is grounded in... something we’ve never quite traced. And so, our sciences speak of space, time, and matter, the holy trinity of the physical.

This seems objective. Sensible. But it’s a bit like explaining music by measuring the silence between notes.

We forget that the lens through which we view existence is itself part of the equation. We are studying the infinite with tools designed for the measurable. We are asking what’s beyond the veil while refusing to let go of the flashlight.

---

The Echoes of Three: A Pattern Hidden in Everything

Patterns don’t lie. And the number three? It shows up too often to be coincidence.

• Past. Present. Future.

• Mind. Body. Spirit.

• Birth. Life. Death.

• Thought. Word. Deed.

• Kingdom. Power. Glory.

Even in the dark corners of theology, the same rhythm reiterates, name, mark, number, the descriptors of a beast in the Holy Bible, mimicking the sacred in corrupted symmetry.

Why three? Why always three?

Perhaps because a line needs two points, but a reality needs a third.
Two defines contrast. Three defines structure. It introduces tension, and thus, motion. It breathes into stillness a kind of divine complexity.

This is why the triangle is the most stable shape in architecture. Why stories follow three acts. Why even your very sense of self, your “I”, is suspended somewhere between your body, your soul, and your consciousness watching both.

---

Can Something Exist That Has No Existence?

Let’s play with a paradox.

Can you imagine something that does not, in any way, exist?

You might say “non-existence.” But even that is framed through existence, it's the absence of something. You might imagine void, but void is still a thing, defined by what it lacks.

Try to hold in your mind the idea of what cannot be held. You can’t. The very act of thinking it gives it form, name, and contour.
Existence is the default. The starting point. It is not the presence of something. It is presence itself.

So what does that say about what’s real? Or what’s eternal?

If existence is the default, if to think of nothing is still to conjure something, then what does that mean for death?

We say a person "no longer exists" when they die. But is that even conceptually possible? To not exist? Or is that just our way of marking transformation we cannot fully see?

You can’t think nothing without giving it shape. You can’t un-be.

So maybe death isn't absence. Maybe it’s just the next arrangement of presence.
Not a vanishing, but as if slipping out of the frame and into the next.

What if non-existence… doesn’t exist?

Not a destination, but a fiction we whisper to make sense of silence.
A shadow we cast with the light of being.

Because if existence has no true opposite,
Then nothing is ever truly gone.
Everything simply becomes.

And maybe… it always was.

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
— John 1:1 (KJV)

---

Above. Beyond. Yet Within.

There is a phrase that arrived in my mind once, not from a textbook, not from a prayer, but from that quiet frequency where language first learns to speak.

Above. Beyond. Yet Within.

At first, I thought it to be poetic. Then I realized it was structural.

• Above: That which transcends, governs, watches.

• Beyond: That which outlives, outlasts, escapes definition.

• Within: That which dwells, moves, breathes through us.

It echoed the architecture of divinity. The blueprint of belief. It whispered of something that is not contained, but contains.
It wasn’t just religious. It was recursive, a fractal folding in on itself from cosmos to cell.

Whether you call it GOD, or Consciousness, or simply “the pattern,” there’s something real about this shape. Something ancient. Intimate.
It’s the shape behind the shapes. The name that no language can carry, and yet every tongue has tried to pronounce.

---

The Final Thread

If you’ve come with me this far, across systems and syllables, through paradoxes and poetry, here’s the final confession:

I’m not religious.
I’ve read the scriptures, tasted the sacraments, and walked the aisles. But what holds me is not ritual. It’s rhythm.
Not creed, but convergence.

I believe in Spirit.
In the nameless, numberless, markless flame that has danced behind every mythology, every breakthrough, every unspoken miracle.
And I believe that flame speaks in threes.

Above. Beyond. Yet Within.

It’s not a doctrine. It’s not a dogma.
It’s an invitation.

To look again. To listen deeper.
To realize the shape of everything has been whispering to you all along.

Existence. Three syllables.

---